SOCIAL LISTENING
Patagonia is an American retail company,
specializing in the sale and distribution of silent sports gear and outdoor
attires. The company’s value proposition makes it a unique and interesting
brand. Unlike most retail brands that focus on inexpensive material, rapid
production, and low-cost manufacturing, Patagonia prides itself in sourcing
high-quality material ethically. As noted in its mission statement-We are in business to save our home planet-the
brand’s primary goal is to promote environmental sustainability. Hence, Patagonia
uses social media as an activism platform rather than for product marketing
purposes. Ideally, the fact that Patagonia uses its social media platforms to
raise awareness among its customers on environmental and social causes, instead
of driving sales, intrigued me. Moreover, people are generally responding positively
to Patagonia’s efforts, especially on Twitter.
For example, these tweets by @Meg9Time, @Wendynilsson, and Rachel Maddow from MSNBC
show that Twitter users are responding
positively to Patagonia’s environmental and social crusades. In her post,
@wendynilsson specifically states that she supports Patagonia’s recent campaign
against the proposed voting rules, which are designed to make it difficult for a
certain group to vote. Similarly, Rachel Maddow acknowledges Patagonia’s
efforts to speak against voting restrictions alongside other top American
brands such as Cisco. Lastly, @Meg9Time’s tweet applauds Patagonia’s ethical
production of children's outdoor clothing as it aligns with the company’s value
proposition of environmental sustainability.
The
company’s marketing efforts are specifically designed to raise awareness on
different environmental and social issues. While most brands’ efforts are centered
on profits, Patagonia is attempting to use social media as an instrument to
spread awareness on current issues such as voting rights and preserving
old-growth forests. Considering this goal, Twitter is the most ideal choice for
Patagonia’s marketing efforts are due to its learned and active demographics.
Research shows that Twitter is the most ideal platform for political
initiatives as around 45% of its users have college degrees and it boasts 330
million active users each month (Clarke).
These statistics indicate that Patagonia is better placed to reach a wider,
informed audience on Twitter than other platforms. However, Patagonia does not
engage with its audience on this platform. Social listening is crucial for
Patagonia’s social media efforts since it helps the brand to track and analyze
what people are saying about the company, thus allowing it to respond
accordingly. Essentially, social listening can help Patagonia identify gaps in
its marketing and awareness efforts, thereby responding accordingly. In contrast,
Patagonia does not respond to any of its replies or mentions on Twitter.
For instance, in @jackvonstrap’s tweet, Patagonia should have engaged this user to help him understand that activism takes precedence over profits. If I were the brand manager, I would respond to this customer by referring him to the company’s mission statement and explaining that environmental sustainability and social rights are more important than profits. Such a response would be vital in promoting customer engagement. However, it would also help the brand notice one of the gaps in its social media efforts, which is a lack of sufficient product marketing. Therefore, the company would tweet more often about its new products to appease its less political followers.
Work Cited
Clarke, Todd. “14 Social Media Best Practices You
Should Follow in 2020.” 26 June 2019. Hoot
Suite. blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-best-practices/.
评论
发表评论